Emily has spent years on this show saying out loud that faculty are the blockers: slow, allergic to innovation, standing in the way of anything operational. This week the other side sent a representative.
Jonathan Teubner has taught and researched on three continents (Virginia, Melbourne, fellowships in Paris and Berlin, now Harvard) and has never once sat in an admissions office. He's also co-founder and CEO of FilterLabs.AI, which means he has hired the graduates this system produces and spends his working life finding real signal underneath official narratives. He opens by calling himself an emissary from the enemy. Then he makes an argument Emily didn't see coming: the hostility she keeps running into is downstream of a recruiting war faculty never agreed to fight.
What follows is the conversation the two halves of a university almost never have out loud.
In this episode:
- Why faculty describe themselves as "pure victims" of undergraduate admissions, and the escapism hiding inside that claim
- What Jonathan sees in a Harvard classroom that no application file shows: students who optimized their way in and can't say what they love
- His "outlandish prophecy" about which institutions are still standing in 20 years, and which ones accelerate their own extinction
- Why the best hires at his AI company were history and art majors, not the people who majored in the skill
- What every other country never built, and why "3% from the state" made him question the word public
- The thought experiment he'd hand every enrollment leader: what if you only found 500 students this year?
- His magic wand answer, from a man who sells technology for a living: take the devices out
.png)
.png)
.png)
